Is there no ethical line these radical Conservatives won't cross? How can Clarence Thomas ever be expected to rule impartially in any case that his wife has a political interest? Has Clarence Thomas ever ruled impartially on anything without clearing it first with Antonin Scalia? Is Clarence Thomas intellectually able to rule impartially on any issue whatsoever?
That would be a no, no, no, and no.
No comments:
Post a Comment